![]() With a focal ratio of f/9.2, this telescope is giving fairly narrow views compared to some similar models.įor the complete beginner, they might not notice the drop in optical quality. Up until I fussed with the telescope for a while, the images were bad and they never really became good.Īnother issue could be the short focal length of this telescope. ![]() Once everything was aligned the way I wanted it, the images weren’t bad necessarily, they just weren’t great. I’m not sure if this is an issue with the included eyepieces or something with the quality of the mirrors or some kind of collimation or focusing quirk that I just wasn’t understanding. Even when I had everything lined up properly, focused where I wanted it and stable the images just weren’t as good as similar models. Images rarely looked sharp and focusing was a chore. The problem is, the image quality just isn’t all that good. It is a basic Newtonian reflector that aims to give you the ease of use and image quality of similar Newtonian reflectors. That is a standard size for a telescope at this price and for this kind of audience. So-So Optical QualityĪt 76mm the aperture of the Bushnell Voyager Reflector Telescope isn’t bad. Overall, I would say your money is best spent elsewhere. If you want to try and take a flyer on a newer brand with a focus on added value, you might be able to find something here to like, especially on a budget. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |